About Us  | Regional Conference  |  Meeting Information  |  Officers  |  Minutes Bylaws  |  Activities  |  Education and Outreach  |  Links

image

 

2005-2006 Meeting Minutes
2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007

Minutes of the November 14, 2006 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS)

The Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) met at 630 pm on November 14, 2006 at Ruby Tuesday's in Bloomington IL. 22 people attended the meeting. 22 Members.


Business

Presidents Report

Ernie Goetsch, chapter president, greeted the attendees and thanked them for coming. He commented on the excellent speaker set up for the meeting then went on to the CIAMS board reports.


Secretary's Report

Ed Shimon, reported that he is fine tuning the meeting minutes from the previous meetings and will be running them through the board members before submitting them to the AMS for inclusion in BAMS. Rod Palmer remarked about how anyone would know if there are any additions to the minutes. Ed responded that he would make them available to all for comments and corrections if necessary. They would be available on the CIAMS website for everyone to view.

Treasurer's Report

Mary Schoen-Peterson, reported that not much activity had taken place the past 2 months. We paid for the speaker's dinner at the last meeting. 13 people have paid their dues as of the start of this meeting. So we have $195 income from dues so far. That gives us $1674 in the general fund. No conference fund activity, so we still have $2794 in the conference fund. She asked that everyone pay their dues as soon as possible. $15/person.

She mentioned that she was glad to see more people tonight, since we only had 12 people at the last meeting, and 22 at the picnic. She requested that everyone make sure they initial the attendance sheet and annotate whether their dues were paid or not.

Web site costs will be paid. $195 - It goes to renew our costs for keeping up our website for the next 2 years.

Committee Reports -

Education Committee - Mike Spinar - He attended an Illinois State Science Olympiad meeting. He has a few people earmarked from the Dept of Atmosphere Science. Anyone interested contact him. Broad topics, anything related to the atmosphere.

Conference Committee - Steve Hilberg - nothing new to report


New Business:

1. Mike Kruk -
Presented results from our submission for chapter of the year award - CIAMS made the National Honor Roll!! He led a round of applause for everyone who played a roll. A great deal of hard work went into the recognition: the AMS conference, all of the speakers, and education committee accomplishments. Mike is still working on getting a Meisinger Historic roadside marker, with Glen and Sam. Honor Roll status lasts for one year! He said we will probably try again when we have the next conference, since it seems like that's when we do our most work.

2. Rod Palmer -
He proposed a suggestion on starting a recruitment program to boost our membership numbers. Mike Kruk asked if Rod was interested in being a part of the membership committee, and everyone laughed. Rod said he was part of other committees at this time. Rod commented that we have not had any 'new blood' lately, but Mike pointed out that we have had 6 new members since March, but they just have not shown up for the meetings yet. There were comments that maybe the new members just wanted to vote, and haven't committed to coming to meetings yet. Getting them to participate is our next challenge.

3. Mike P. -
Diane mentioned the U of I Dept of Atmospheric Science was starting an undergrad program. We should be aware of when that starts so we can solicit the undergrads, since they are typically more active in AMS than the graduate students.
Chris Miller said he had a meeting with the Dept. Head, Mr. Bob Rauber, and he said that students would not arrive at the university until the fall of 2008. The program would be finalized this year, 2007, but no students active in the program until fall of 2008. A little less than 2 years away.
Ernie agreed that we should get the students involved. It would benefit them as well as us. Mike agreed. Ernie pointed out that Chris' visit to the U of I was one of gathering information on how the NWS office as well as the AMS chapter could work together with the U of I on projects and meteorological issues.

4. Ernie made a request for any additional new business, and none was presented. So he proceeded to the speaker of the night.


Presentation
IMPACT OF THE PACIFIC DECADAL OSCILLATION ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AIR TEMPERATURE AND THE ARCTIC OSCILLATION IN THE US

By Dagmar Budikova

Associate Professor
Department of Geography-Geology
Illinois State University, Normal
dbudiko@ilstu.edu

B.S. in Environmental Studies - Toronto 1994
PhD in Climatology - University of Calgary 2001
Research interests -- Pacific Decadal Oscillation, El Nino, climate change

Dagmar began the presentation by defining teleconnections as a persistent atmospheric circulation spanning large geographic areas, that last several weeks to many years. She discussed that they are important due to their affects on large scale flow, like jet streams and atmospheric waves. This can all lead to changes in our surface weather conditions, especially during the winter season across North America.

Dagmar indicated that the primary teleconnections that affect North America are, El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Pacific North American (PNA) pattern, North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) or Arctic Oscillation (AO), and the North Pacific (NP) pattern or Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). These teleconnections are have their most noticeable influence during the winter season.

Dagmar went on to further discuss the PDO and described it as a recurring pattern of climate variability in the tropical and extratropical Pacific Ocean, but primarily the extratropical. She mentioned it represents long-term changes in the ocean-atmosphere system, and it has a Warm phase and a Cool phase. The Warm phase consists of deep low pressure and cooler than normal Sea Surface Temperatures (SST) in the North Pacific Ocean, with an El Nino-like warming of the eastern equatorial Pacific waters off of South America. Dagmar described the Cool phase as consisting of warmer than normal SSTs in the North Pacific under high pressure, with La Nina-like SSTs in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean.

She showed a time series of the PDO from 1900 to October 2006. It highlighted the significant interannual and decadal variability, with the decadal variability more dominant. Since 1900, the variability has shifted between predominantly positive to predominantly negative every 10 to 15 years. The last positive phase ended in the late 90s, with negative phase for the early 2000s. However, current information shows we may have shifted back to a positive phase since 2002. Dagmar indicated that more data needs to be examined to determine if that is the case.
The PDO is primarily characterized by analyzing the SSTs in the North Pacific Ocean poleward of 20 deg N. Dagmar indicated that the mechanisms responsible for the PDO are not understood, and the potential predictability is not known. Basically, it is not consistently reproduced in global climate models (GCM). However, she said that when we recognize what phase we the PDO is in, it does provide some value for improving seasonal climate forecasts, especially in the western United States (U.S.).

She discussed the PDO and U.S. winter Surface Air Temperatures (SAT). The positive PDO had a much better statistical significance, with the western and eastern thirds of the U.S. in the 95% correlation level. The Positive phase has a warming SATs in the western U.S. and a cooling in the eastern U.S. The negative is somewhat the opposite SATs of the positive PDO, but the correlation is mostly significant directly along the West Coast only.

Dagmar went on to define the Arctic Oscillation (AO), indicating that it is identified by analyzing the Sea Level Pressure (SLP) poleward of 20 deg N in the North Atlantic. It represents the state of the atmospheric circulation over the Arctic, with opposing atmospheric pressure patterns over the Polar and midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.

The Positive Phase of the AO is highlighted by stronger than normal low pressure over the Arctic, and stronger high pressure in the mid-latitudes of the north Atlantic. The pressure distribution typically creates a stronger jet stream flow from west to east across the north Atlantic pushing storms quickly across Canada and keeping the Continental U.S. warmer than normal during the winter season. The Negative Phase of the AO is highlighted by weak high pressure over the Arctic with weak low pressure in the mid-latitudes of the North Atlantic. This allows a more meridonal flow south through Canada and into the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes region of the U.S. This sets the stage for more cold air outbreaks and winter storms for that area during the winter season.

Dagmar further discussed the AO and its relation to the NAO. The SLP anomalies of the NAO and AO have almost a .95 or 1.0 correlation over the Northern Hemisphere winter season. That means that the dipole of high and low pressure in the North Atlantic is very similar between the Positive and Negative NAO as the Positive and Negative AO. The Pacific portion of the AO does not have nearly as strong of a correlation with the dipole SLP signature.

She presented a slide of the time series of the AO since 1900, focusing on January through March. It indicated that since 1970, the AO has had a strong tendency to stay in the positive phase. It does not have as strong of a decadal signature as the PDO.

When in a positive AO, she should that much of the U.S. is warmer than normal, with the main statistically significant area being the eastern half of the U.S. During a negative AO, much of the U.S. is colder than normal with a majority of the lower 48 states in the statistically significant range (95% correlation).

As the main focus of this presentation, Dagmar examined the combined affect of the AO and PDO on the U.S. winter season. She accomplished this; by looking at the overall influence of the AO on the winter SATs, with and without the influence of the PDO, by analyzing the role played by the PDO on the relationships between the extreme phases of the AO and SATs, and by looking at the surface circulation patterns associated with the observed SAT conditions under various AO/PDO regimes.

She used data from 1900 through 2002, including SAT records from 344 US climate divisions, and SLP data for the Northern Hemisphere. She combined the winter timeseries SAT plots of the AO and PDO in the negative, neutral, and positive phases, resulting in a 9 box comparison grid. This allowed her to focus on the affects of the AO and PDO in concert with each other. When looking at a the SAT differences between a positive and negative AO, while combining it with a Neutral PDO, there are signals that stand out more prominently. The warm bias of the SAT difference of the positive and negative AO is reduced in coverage from the eastern 2/3rds of the U.S. to just the south and southeast US. When doing the same comparison with the SAT differences between a Positive and Negative PDO during a neutral AO, the strong cold bias of the southeastern US was accentuated.

When doing a similar analysis on the Positive PDO during a Negative AO, Dagmar found that there was not a significant effect on the US SATs except for the SW US being slightly warmer, and the far NE US being colder than normal.

Further SAT analysis of the Negative PDO with the Negative AO showed a strong cold bias across the northern plains of the US. She found much colder conditions from Montana, through the Dakotas, to Wisconsin. The rest of the US was not statistically significant.

A look at the Positive PDO during a Negative AO showed a strong warm bias for the upper Midwest and the western US.

Analyzing a Positive PDO and a Positive AO indicated a more scattered solution. There were very few statistically significant areas, with a small area of warming in the intermountain west and some cooling in the northeast US.

A Negative PDO combined with a Positive AO gave a correlation for colder than normal SATs along the west coast of the US, with very weak signals elsewhere.

Dagmar also looked at the effects of both extremes of the PDO during a Positive AO and found that overall, there is a strong warm bias for the west coast, and a strong cold bias for the Ohio Valley and the northeast US.

She analyzed the SLP patterns in much the same way as the SAT patterns. She wanted to see if similar correlations could be found. When looking at the Negative AO combined with a neutral PDO, the effects of the Negative AO were enhanced. There was an abnormally strong Arctic High, along with a strengthened Aleutian Low. The Bermuda High and Icelandic Low were slightly weakened during a Negative PDO.

Going further, she compared the SLP anomalies during a Negative AO with the Negative PDO. It indicated a stronger than normal high pressure in the Hudson Bay and James Bay areas of Canada, allowing more frequent surges of cold air into the Upper Midwest of the US. Statistically significant cooling was indicated from the Northwest US through Wisconsin.

PDO SLP differences during a Negative AO showed lower pressures across Canada and the Aleutians, which would create a more southerly flow across the western US. This correlated to warmer than normal conditions for the western US and the Upper Midwest.

PDO SLP differences during a Positive AO were not as statistically significant. Dagmar noticed a strengthening of the Arctic low and a weakening of the Aleutian low, which tended to have little affect on the normally expected effects of the Positive AO.

When looking at the strongly Positive PDO and strongly Negative PDO during a Positive AO, there was a strong correlation for a deeper Aleutian Low and Canadian High, which set the stage for significantly warmer than normal SATs for the western US and colder than normal SATs for the northeast US.

Dagmar's final conclusions were that the PDO clearly has an affect on the SAT tendencies across the United States during both extremes of the AO. The north-south dipole structure of the SLP field was altered during the extreme phases of the PDO.

She concluded that during a positive AO, the PDO most significantly alters the SAT anomalies west of the Cascades, in the Ohio Valley region, and along the northeast coast of the US. During a Negative AO, she concluded that the PDO extremes most significantly alter the SAT anomalies across the northern Great Plains, and throughout the western US.

Questions from the attendees:
What about El Nino in combination? She said that would be too complicated for her right now.
Which affect drives the other, the circulation or the ocean? We don't know for sure.
During a Positive AO, the stratosphere is colder? Yes, due to the strong Arctic low that develops.

Adjournment

After questions the meeting adjourned around 9:15 PM.

Upcoming Meeting
The next meeting of the CIAMS will be on January 25, 2007 in Champaign.


Ed Shimon, Secretary, 2006-2007.

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes of the May 2, 2006 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS)

            The Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) will meet on May 2, 2006 in Decatur, Illinois.


Minutes of the March 16, 2006 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS)

            The Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) met on March 16, 2006 at Ruby Tuesday Restaurant in Bloomington, Illinois. 33 people attended the meeting.

Business

Presidents Report

            Mike Kruk, chapter president, announced that elections would be held at our next meeting on May 2nd, and that the nominating committee was being formed to solicit nominations.  Votes prior to the meeting can be by mail or e-mail.  Votes also will be taken at the next meeting.

Treasurer’s Report

            Llyle Barker, reported that as of March 14, 2006, twenty-eight full members have paid their dues for the 05-06 meeting year for an Income of $420.  As a reminder, you must pay your dues in order to vote.

            Aside from reimbursement for the January meeting speakers meal, the General Funds balance is $1440.50.  No conference fund actions have been made since the last meeting.

Education/Public Outreach

            On March 4th, Mike Kruk, Sam Shea, and Leslie Ensor of the CIAMS handed out 20 chapter brochures and spoke about benefits of joining the chapter at the Emergency Manager and Media Severe Weather workshop hosted by the WSFO in Lincoln, Illinois.

            Bob Scott and Bob Rauber each taught 2 classes of boy scouts at Holy Cross School in Champaign, Illinois at an annual Boy Scout education event designed to help the scouts attain various badges. About 80 boy scouts earned their weather badge.

            The Education Committee administered the Urbana Regional portion of the Science Olympiad Exam. The committee is working with the Lincoln Weather Service Office to draft the Illinois State Olympiad Competition on April 29th.  The National Competition will be held in May.

Annual AMS Meeting

            Mike Palecki represented the Chapter at the Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society, attending the breakfast meeting and presenting our chapter poster.  He reported that next year there will be a poster competition.

Upcoming Meetings

            The next meeting of the CIAMS will be held in Decatur, Illinois on Tuesday, May 2nd.  Jay Searles, a local broadcast meteorologist, will speak at our final meeting of the 2005-2006 fiscal year. Again annual elections will be held at that meeting

Presentation

            James Auten, lead forecaster at the Lincoln Illinois National Weather Service Office (ILX) presented a talk entitled “A Look at the Severe Weather Warning Operations inside the National Weather Service”.  His talk included detailed information on 1) the processes involved in preparing for successful operations, 2) staffing positions, 3) the operational plan, 4) factors to consider in the days preceding a severe weather event, during the event and actions taken following the event.  Finally, 5) examples of operations from an event on June 29, 1998 when the NEXRAD Radars were present, but computer support was limited, and from a recent March 12-13, 2006 tornado outbreak affecting the local Springfield IL area.

The process of severe weather warning operations begins with the education of the staff regarding severe weather, initially at universities, and then as employees attending workshops and seminars, reviewing literature and researching past severe weather outbreaks.  Training of staff continues formally by attending Radar School and other NWS schools, and informally by replaying self-paced or real-time simulations from archived data on the Warning Event Simulator (WES).  Real-time operations i.e. real- time experience is of course a large component of staff training, as anything can happen.  Verification of forecast warnings are made to complete the training.  This includes damage surveys (how many of the 20 counties under the warning had severe weather) and post event reviews (using WES): How well did we do?  What we could have done better?  What was missed?  What distracted us? 

The positions involved in the warning process include: the Warning Coordinator (WCO), who coordinates and directs the operations, ensuring proper staffing levels, keeping  track of warnings and statements and filling in when necessary; the Warning Meteorologist, who evaluates the radar, satellite, lightning, surface data, and spotter reports, and who issues necessary warnings and statements (if the warning area is large or complex enough, sometimes 2 or 3 are necessary); the Communications Person (COP) who handles all in-coming phone calls, National Warning System (NAWAS), phone and e-mail reports, and advises county emergency coordinators of threats; the communications person or the Console Replacement System (CRS) Monitor who ensures that all warnings and other statements are getting onto the CRS, i.e. to the NOAA Weather Radio; the Ham Radio Volunteers (HAM) who broadcast warnings and statements using amateur radio and who solicit and collect reports from Emergency Operation Coordinators (EOCs); the Long Term Forecasters, (LTF, two for the 08-16 LST and two for the 20-04 LST hour shifts) who create and disseminate forecast products; the Short Term Forecaster (STF, manned 24 hr/day) who is the meso-analyst, and also updates forecast products and issues short term and terminal forecasts; the Hydrometeorologist Technician (HTM) / intern who coordinates the upper air launches and collects data from the Surface Weather Operational Stations (SWOPS) and NWS cooperative sites and issues routine climate forecasts; the Electronic Technician (ET) who insures equipment is working properly and stands by to fix what is necessary (AWIS, Upper Air, Computer), the Flash Flood Analyst who monitors flash flood potential, radar precipitation products, real-time precipitation and flood reports (what counties and basins are susceptible to flash flooding), and the Shift Leader who coordinates between the Warning Coordinator and the staff, and who attempts to minimized distractions to the staff.

            In the days leading up to a severe weather event, the public, media, and Emergency Managers are notified of a severe weather potential via the Hazardous Weather Outlook (HWO), e-mail, and other weather discussions. Staffing for the event is planned.  Conference calls are conducted with Emergency Managers and the media for Moderate and High Risk Outlooks.

            For a minor event that involves only one sector of the region, 5 – 7 staff are usually used: the WCO/COP, the Warning Forecaster, the STF/Meso-Analyst, the HMT/Intern, the CRS Monitor, the LTF (if needed) and the Flash Flood Analyst (if needed).  For a moderate event that involves two sectors, 4-6 additional persons are added: an additional Warning Forecaster and a COP to assist each Warning Forecaster; and an ET.  For a major event that involves 2 – 3 sectors of the warning region, 11 - 13 staff are used (adding an additional Warning Forecaster and a COP, plus 2-3 HAMS. There are only 22 employees at the ILS-NWSFO in total, so a significant proportion of the staff is involved for major severe weather outbreaks, both on the day of the event and on the days following the event.

Following a severe weather event further planning is needed:  additional reports are collected, preparations are made for damage surveys (if needed) and the damage surveys are accomplished; evaluation of staffing needs is performed, particularly if more severe weather is imminent.  Media calls are fielded, necessary reports are prepared, and web pages are created for the Internet to disseminate information to the public and emergency managers.

            A number of factors are considered in planning by the warning coordinator that can affect his/her decisions.  Is the environment tornadic and could this change?  What type of storm does the Warning Coordinator envision when considering the synoptic, mesoscale and storm environment?  As the event evolves, does this conceptual model match what is happening?  What is the history of the storm?  What type of damage (hail, wind, rain) reports are being received once the storm has reached the forecast area?  What is the time of day, the day of the week, the time of the year?  Are people asleep, on their way home from work, are there leaves on the trees?  How will high winds, heavy rains or hail affect the region?

            Distractions can affect the performance of the staff during a severe weather event and these are monitored by the Shift Leader:  Equipment problems, communication, computer or radar malfunctions can be very disruptive.  Bad / late reports can result in staff taking extra time to consider the implications of the report, or may mislead the staff particularly if other distractions are present.  Fatigue, hunger, and personal issues can distract personnel.  Music can be distracting.  Life threatening reports, particularly when they are located in the region where a staffer’s family resides can be another distraction.

Mr. Auten then proved two examples of the warning process in full operation.  The first of these was a bow echo / derecho event of June 30, 1998.  On this date, a line of storms in Iowa that had produced wind damage and tornadoes was approaching central Illinois.  A large area of ground-relative radial velocities in excess of 64 kts, as observed by radar was racing towards the area.  The primary operational team consisted of three staff members, one to concentrate on the radar with the single PUP station present, one warning decision maker who communicated with the Emergency Managers, and one person to key the warnings and statements on the single PC present.  Data from 3 NOAA radars, 1 satellite, and 1 upper air site were available to the trio.  Bow echoes are known to produce tornados, especially along the leading edge.  In this case the leading edge was extensive, spanning nearly the entire county warning area (CWA).  This prompted the trio to question where warnings should be issued to best represent the danger posed by this bow echo.  The team wanted to heighten awareness of the approaching line, and made a bold move by over-warning.  They issued multiple county tornado warnings (so that the sirens would deploy) all along the line, in each of 35 counties.  In the end, the derecho produced 7 tornadoes and all 35 counties in the ILX-CWA experienced some damage.

The second example presented by Mr. Auten focused on the Springfield Illinois tornado event of March 12, 2006.  On this date, a dangerous supercell thunderstorm was approaching.  Over the intervening 8 years, staffing, computer power and access to observational resources had expanded, and more precise locations for tornado warning could be issued.  The sequence of events is as follows.  Early Sunday March 12, an e-mail was sent to Emergency Managers for a conference call at noon.  There was a high risk of severe weather over Central Illinois.  The Storm Prediction Center requested 18Z and 21Z upper air radiosonde flights.  Additional conference calls were held at 2 pm and 6 pm.  The first Tornado Watch was issued around noon local time until 10 pm covering a large area of the country from Oklahoma to Central Illinois.  Staffing was increased from 3 to 5 around noon.  Storms were present to the west and southeast, so two warning sectors were established.  Staffing was increased to 8 people by mid-afternoon.

The weather was quiet from 4 to 7 pm.  But by 7 pm, two supercells had merged into one massive supercell in eastern Missouri / western Illinois and was approaching Springfield IL in the southwest quadrant of the CWA.  Additional storms were moving northeast towards the northwest areas of CWA.  Springfield TV station WICS and Decatur TV station WAND began broadcasting live weather reports.  The NWS NOAAA Weather Radio broadcast went live on SPI NWR.  A situational awareness screen was activated at the Weather Service Office to monitor local TV broadcasts, and to make sure that warnings were properly disseminated.  By 8 pm staffing had increased to 9, including the ET.  Two NWS employees that lived in Springfield were contacted.  2-3 HAM volunteers were present during entire event.

            Once the first tornado warning was sent out, the entire staff was busy.  Sixteen (16) of 22 employees worked at some point during the event.  A warm front moved north late in the day, but quickly.  The main supercell entered the CWA in southeastern Scott County at 7:29 pm and exited CWA from southeastern McLean County around 9:30 pm.  During the event there were 6 confirmed tornadoes in the CWA, one F1 and five F2 tornadoes (2 in Springfield).  Severe weather came in 4 waves, with 2 more waves after the Springfield supercell.  Warning Operations lasted from noon on Sunday March 12 until 8 am Monday March 13.  Two damage surveys were conducted that Monday and one on Tuesday.  Many in the office also had worked severe weather operations on Saturday evening March 11, 2006.  It had been an eventful week for the ILX Weather Service Office.

Adjournment

            After questions the meeting adjourned around 9:45 PM.

Nancy Westcott, Secretary, 2005-2006.


Minutes of the Jan 26, 2006 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS)

            The Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) met on January 26, 2006 at Ryan’s Steakhouse in Champaign, Illinois. 13 people attended the meeting.

Business

National News

            Mike Kruk, chapter president, announced that the December 2005 issue of BAMS featured two short articles highlighting the CIAMS in addition to our regular meeting minutes. The first, entitled “Modern/Future Extreme Cold Air Outbreaks”, discussed was based on a talk given by Steve Vavrus of the University of Wisconsin – Madison during the 2nd Midwest Severe and Hazardous Weather Conference in October. The second, “Association Between Seasonal Cycles of Teleconnections and Tornado Frequency in the United States”, featured material presented by Patrick Frances of Bowling Green State University at the July Central Illinois/Central Indiana AMS joint chapter meeting. For reference, the two articles are on pages 1721-22 and 1723-25, respectively. This is good news for the organization’s bid to become AMS “Chapter of the Year”. Our materials will be submitted by May 1st and we will find out the winner of the award in October.

Treasurer’s Report

            After reimbursing several speakers, we have $1407 in our general fund. In addition, Steve Hilberg noted that the final total for the Midwest Severe and Hazardous Weather Conference is in. We spent $2791, for a $903 loss.

Education/Public Outreach

            On March 4th, several members of the CIAMS will hand out chapter materials at the Emergency Manager and Media Severe Weather workshop in Lincoln, Illinois. This will serve to increase recognition of and encourage interest in the local chapter. In addition, the Education Committee will administer the Urbana Regional portion of the Science Olympiad Exam. The committee will work with the Lincoln Weather Service Office to draft the Illinois State Competition on April 29th.

Upcoming Meetings

            The next meeting of the CIAMS will be held in Lincoln, Illinois on Thursday, March 16th. James Auten from the Lincoln Weather Service Office will discuss the severe weather warning process at the Weather Service. Jay Searles, a local broadcast meteorologist, will speak at our final meeting of the 2005-2006 dues year. Annual elections will be held at that meeting, on Tuesday, May 2nd. Stay tuned for more information!

Presentation

            Eric Snodgrass, master’s degree candidate from the Department of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Illinois gave a talk entitled, “Synergizing High-Resolution Satellite Data and Radar Data to Assess Trade Wind Cloud Precipitation”. Eric was the radar coordinator for the Rain In Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO) field campaign and is an expert in satellite remote sensing with GIS-based applications.

            Trade wind cumulus clouds are ubiquitous over the tropical oceans. New, higher resolution satellite data is beginning to show just how widespread the clouds are. However, important questions remain about their role in the global thermal, radiative, and moisture budgets. Chief among these are the questions of which clouds precipitate and how much. Since the clouds are typically far from land, the precipitation must be inferred by using one of three methods :  1) relating the infrared thermal brightness temperature to precipitation rate,  2) passively measuring the microwave absorption of the clouds, or 3) using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) to actively scan microwave absorption of clouds.  However, these methods are not useful for measuring trade-wind Cu, because they are warm, shallow, and typically, sub-pixel in scale.

            The RICO experiment was designed specifically to study the microphysics, scale, frequency of occurrence, and generation mechanisms of trade-wind cumulus. In addition to aircraft measurements of the cloud microphysics and environmental conditions, the Scanning S- and Ka- band Dual-Polarization radar assembly (S-POLKa) was located on the island of Barbuda. Various satellite products also were used for this study, including the 275 m resolution Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) imagery.

            The main purpose of this study was to correlate the 10 cm radar returns with cloud pixels sampled from the MISR. This was done at 10:45 am local time, which allowed the satellite and radar data to be matched in time. The radar volumes were then mapped to the MISR pixels using a 3-step procedure. First, the radar data was geolocated in three dimensions using a sounding-derived refractive index. Next, the radar’s Velocity-Azimuth Display (VAD) wind profile was used to shift pixels to account for drift due to the background flow. Once the MISR and S-POLKa data were time-matched, the radar data were resampled to the MISR grid. Then contaminated echoes (e.g., local island effects, birds) were removed using a combination of image masks, differential reflectivity polarization, and radial velocity quality control procedures. Finally, the S-band change from Bragg to Rayleigh scattering at 5 dBZ was used as a threshold to eliminate all non-precipitation echoes.

            The majority of the cloud pixels analyzed using this method showed no precipitation, despite the considerable vertical extent of many of them. Roughly 2 percent of the cloudy pixels had reflectivities greater than 24 dBZ, corresponding to a 1 mm/hr rainfall rate. Out of the 3 organizational patterns of trade wind cumulus, wind parallel bands, multicellular clusters, and outflow bands, outflow bands produced the most rain and wind parallel bands, the least. Overall, the reflectivities indicate that the region experiences an average of .75 mm day-1 of rain, with an intensity peak occurring in the early morning hours. Overall, this means that trade wind cumulus systems are 11-15% efficient at returning latent heat to the ocean, a finding of great importance to the numerical modeling and climate communities.

Adjournment

After questions the meeting adjourned around 9:15 PM.

Mike Spinar, Secretary, 2004-2005 for Nancy Westcott, Secretary, 2005-2006.


Minutes of the December 6, 2005 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS).

            The Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) met on December 6, 2005 at Marcia’s on the Waterfront in Decatur, IL.  14 people attended the meeting, which was rescheduled from November 15th due to a severe convective weather threat.

Business

            Mike Kruk, Chapter President, announced that Dr. Michael Palecki, Regional Climatologist for the Midwestern Regional Climate Center (MRCC), will serve as the CIAMS chapter representative at the local chapter breakfast held during the annual meeting of National AMS.  In addition to our summer picnic, Regional Conference, Science Olympiad involvement, and bi-monthly meetings, the Chapter would also like to accomplish the following by May 2006:

(1) Display our local chapter poster at the AMS Annual Meeting,

(2) Perform at least one additional service or outreach opportunity,

(3) Unveil the new chapter logo designed primarily by Sam Shea from the Midwestern Regional Climate Center.

            The treasurer’s report was delivered by Mike Kruk on behalf of Llyle Barker.  To date, we have had 23 dues-paying members.  After the payment of a fee for our website host, we have approximately $1400 remaining in the account.  An additional small sum must be paid to cover remaining expenditures from the Regional Conference.  The Conference is expected to break even once all the bills are tallied.

            Leslie Ensor, member of the Program Committee, reported that the next meeting would be in Champaign on January 19.  Dan Smith from the National Weather Service Office in Lincoln, Illinois is the invited speaker for the meeting.  James Auten, also from the National Weather Service in Lincoln, will be speaking at the Bloomington meeting, currently scheduled for March 16.

            Mike Spinar, chair of the Education Committee, reported that he had attended the first meeting of the 2006 Illinois State Science Olympiad season.  The topic this year is on climate systems and change.  He is looking for interested volunteers to help design and proctor the exam.  More information on dates and times will be posted on the website as they become available (http://www.c-il-ams.org).

            A raffle was then held to give away various publications written by Dr. Theodore Fujita, and previously kept in his personal library, and donated to the Chapter by his son, Kazuya Fujita.  Six packets of publications, including one hardbound book, were raffled at the meeting.  The event was a big hit among those in attendance.

Presentation

            Dr. Carl Bernacchi, Plant Biologist from the Illinois State Water Survey in Champaign, Illinois, gave the invited talk for the evening.  His talk was entitled, “Carbon and Water Fluxes from Corn and Soybeans – Responses to Atmospheric Change.”

            Dr. Bernacchi talked about his work detailing leaf and canopy-scale interactions between the atmospheric boundary layer and corn or soybean plants.  The corn and soybean rotation comprises the largest ecosystem in North America, so this research has dramatic implications for the concentrations of greenhouse gasses.

            The first part of the presentation dealt with the SoyFACE project, which studies leaf responses to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone.  These elevated concentrations are obtained by pumping carbon dioxide and ozone from tiny holes in a hexagonal ring of PVC piping around the field.  The gasses are exuded from the holes in such a way as to blow over the field at a uniform concentration.  Instruments at 16 weather stations measure a wide range on micrometeorological variables, including, soil temperature, incoming and outgoing radiation, canopy temperature, air temperature, humidity, and wind speed.  These measurements are used to determine the net radiative flux, the sensible heat flux, and the heat flux through the soil.  The latent heat flux is determined using the residual in the energy balance.

            The study indicates that the canopy is warmer in the high ozone and high CO2 treatments.  Both elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone regions of the canopy show lower latent heat fluxes.  Stomata are the holes in the leaf surface that allow carbon dioxide and water vapor to diffuse in and out of the leaf.  Plants adjust the size of the stomatal openings to regulate gas exchange between the leaf and the atmosphere.  Thus, a higher stomatal conductance allows more water vapor to be transpired.  However, in the case of elevated carbon dioxide, the leaf area of the plants increases while the conductance decreases.  On the other hand, in the case of elevated ozone concentrations, the leaf area decreases.  The highly reactive ozone damages the plants, whereas the carbon dioxide provides more raw materials for photosynthesis.

            The second portion of the talk dealt with the measurement of agricultural sequestration of atmospheric carbon.  As plants grow, they store vast quantities of carbon above and below ground.  If this carbon is stored long-term below ground, it leads to a removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  However, 80% of the carbon assimilated via photosynthesis is contained within the grain material, which is not sequestered long-term.  Therefore, the question arises as whether no-till agriculture might be a solution to the greenhouse gas induced warming predicted by climate models.

            A series of instrumented towers are used to measure carbon fluxes into and out of corn and soybean fields.  The fluxes, obtained through eddy covariance techniques, reflect a more precise average than typical point measurements of soil carbon.  After three corn/soybean rotations and controlling for modern agricultural practices that release carbon, Dr. Bernacchi found that there was a slight sequestration of atmospheric carbon.  If no-till agricultural practices were universally adopted, this would equate to 20 million metric tons a year.  This value, 1.5 percent of the annual U.S. output, would help the greenhouse gas situation, but not solve the predicted problem.

After questions, the meeting adjourned around 9:10 PM.

Mike Spinar, Secretary, 2004-2005 and Nancy Westcott, Secretary, 2005-2006.


Minutes of the September 14, 2005 Meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society.

Meeting Overview

            The September 14, 2005 meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS) was held at the Bonanza Restaurant in Lincoln, Illinois. The meeting began at approximately 7:45 pm, after everyone had finished their meals. There were 23 people were in attendance. After the business portion of the meeting, Steven Hilberg, Director of the Midwestern Regional Climate Center within the Illinois State Water Survey in Champaign, IL gave a talk entitled, “Deja Vu All Over Again - A Climatological Renaissance in the U.S.” The meeting then concluded shortly after 9:00 PM.

Business

            Mike Kruk researcher at the Illinois State Water Survey and CIAMS President opened the meeting by acknowledging those who helped with the first CIAMS Chapter picnic which was held on August 28th at Weldon Springs State Park near Clinton, Illinois.  Mike reported that the picnic was very successful and hoped that it was the first of many future picnics.  More than 25 members, family, and friends attended the picnic.

            Llyle Barker presented the treasurer’s report.  The Chapter’s account balance is currently $3141, of which $1862 is earmarked for the 2nd Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather Conference in October 2005.  Since the last meeting, money was spent on picnic related items, and for the conference, on the design of the Conference Logo and on reminder postcards labels and stamps.  Prior to the meeting, there were 13-paid chapter members.  There was some discussion that the Program and Activities Committee, along with the Executive Committee is interested in bringing in one outside speaker per year.  This would cost approximately 300-400$, which is the expected funds raised by dues collection.  Additional discussion will take place over the course of the next few weeks to allocate funds to each Standing Committee, and to organize and develop a working budget for the current fiscal year.

            Steve Hilberg, chair of the 2nd Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather Regional Conference, reported that the conference will take place in Champaign, IL on 14-15 October 2005.  Twenty-four abstracts were accepted as oral presentations for the conference.  The three invited speakers (Dr. Paul Kocin, Tim Marshall, PE, and Dr. Morris Weisman) are set to come.  To date, 22 persons have registered for the conference.  The early registration deadline is September 22nd, and thereafter, the cost of the registration increases to $125 from $95.

            The officers are also soliciting interested persons to design a chapter logo and a chapter poster highlighting the people and activities that have contributed to the success of the CIAMS during the past several years.  The logo would be included on the poster.  The poster would be excellent for presentation at the AMS annual meeting in January as well as the Midwest Extremes Conference in October. It would also serve to illustrate why the CIAMS should be selected as “Chapter of the Year.” Please submit any photos or written documentation you may have to Tom Bellinger or Mike Kruk.

            Nancy Westcott gave a brief report on behalf of Mike Spinar for the Education and Public Outreach Committee.  We received an announcement from the American Meteorological Society regarding AMS/Industry Minority College Scholarships.  Please contact Mike Spinar for further information.

            Leslie Ensor represented the Program and Activities Committee at the meeting.  She reported the planned dates for upcoming CIAMS meetings:

            Date                            Day                 Location                     Speaker, affiliation

            November 15             Tuesday,        Decatur,                     Dr. Carl Bernacchi, ISWS

            January 19                 Thursday,       Bloomington              TBA

            March 15                    Wednesday   Champaign                TBA

            May 2             Monday          Clinton                        TBA, Annual Election Mtg

Invited Talk

            Steven Hilberg, Director of the Midwest Regional Climate Center at the Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign gave a talk entitled, “Deja Vu All Over Again - A Climatological Renaissance in the U.S.”  He presented a historical look at weather and climatological observations dating from the early 1600 to the present.  Steve presented a time line of the main agencies that have overseen weather and climate data and its uses, as well as a view of the more recent history of the ebb and flow of climatological services, in other words, a “meteorological climatology”.  

            In recent years, the internet has made accessing climate data easier for researchers, forecasters, and the public user.  Futher more powerful computers allow for data storage and for more easily readable and useful product displays.  Near real-time data are more readily available for input into weather and climate forecasting models, for input into climate products, and for dissemination to the public.  Recent climatological events, such as El Niño in 1997-98, the spring / summer 2005 corn-belt drought, and the hurricane Katrina disaster all have elevated the awareness of the effects of weather and climate on society.  The utility of climate monitoring to the NWS, the USDA, the media and general public has been best exemplified in recent years by the advent of “The Drought Monitor”, a joint venture of the Departments of Agriculture (Agricultural Weather Center) and Commerce (NOAA/CDC, NOAA/NWS, NOAA/NCDC), with assistance from other Federal Agencies, the Regional Climate Centers (RCCs) and State Climatologists among others.  There are encouraging signs regarding interest in and funding for climate services: the National Weather Service has created a Climate Service Division, the Climate Reference Network (CRN) has been funded well enough that 76 sites are now operating, funds have been allocated to modernize the NWS Cooperative Stations, nearly every state now has a state climatologist program, and also common data bases (such as the Applied Climate Information System) are being developed for utilization by the National Weather Service, State Climatologist Offices and the RCCs.  Climate services in its many forms appear to be alive and well at this point in time.


Minutes of the July 28, 2005 Meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society.

Meeting Overview

            The July 28, 2005 meeting of the Central Illinois chapter of the American Meteorological Society (CIAMS) was held in conjunction with the Central Indiana Chapter of the AMS at the Beef House in Covington, Indiana. The meeting began at approximately 6:45 pm, after food was served. Approximately 41 people were in attendance, 15 CIAMS members, and 26 guests. After the business portion of the meeting, Dr. Patrick Francis of Bowling Green State University gave a talk entitled, “Association Between Seasonal Cycles of Teleconnections and Tornado Frequency in the United States.” The meeting then concluded at 8:30 PM.

Business

            Mike Kruk began the new membership year of the CIAMS with a presentation of the new officers. Mike is the new president, taking over for Chris Miller. In addition, Tom Bellinger is taking over the President-Elect position from Mike, Nancy Westcott is the new secretary, replacing Mike Spinar, and Llyle Barker is taking over the treasurer’s position from Maria Peters.

            The CIAMS is having the first Chapter Picnic Sunday August 28th at Weldon Springs State Park near Clinton, Illinois. The Chapter will provide the meat, buns, and the shelter. Attendees are asked to bring a dish or treat to pass.  Interested persons are encouraged to visit the Chapter web site, http://www.c-il-ams.org/picnic.html for further details.

            The new business year means that it is time to set up committees. All members are encouraged to volunteer. If you are interested, please contact the chairperson of one of the following committees:

Program and Activities: Dave Kristovich (dkristo@uiuc.edu)

Education and Public Outreach: Mike Spinar (mspinar@uiuc.edu)

Membership: Ed Kieser (edkieser@will.uiuc.edu)

Conference: Steve Hilberg (hberg@uiuc.edu)

Student: To Be Determined

            The new student committee will be involved in several activities this year, including coordinating the student poster competigion at the Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather conference. Suggestions for other activities this year include the design of a CIAMS Chapter logo and the coordination of a photography competition for all CIAMS members. The newly formed committee is currently in need of members and a chairperson. Please contact one of the officers if you are interested. Please contact Mike Spinar (mspinar@uiuc.edu), if you would like to help specifically with the student poster competition.

            On June 2, 1924, Dr. Clarence Leroy Meisinger of the Weather Bureau and Lt. James T. Neely were killed when their balloon exploded after being struck by lightning in a thunderstorm near Monticello, Illinois. The researchers were investigating the path of airstreams through mid-latitude cyclones. The Meisinger Award is given each year by the American Meteorological Society (AMS) to recognize the tragic death of this scientist who died investigating the atmosphere. The CIAMS wishes to place a historical marker near the crash site in Monticello. A marker costs approximately $1800, half of which will be contributed by the AMS. It is up to the CIAMS to raise the other half of the money. Contact Tom Bellinger (Bellinger@iema.state.il.us) if you have any ideas.

            The officers are also soliciting interested persons to design a chapter poster highlighting the people and activities that have contributed to the success of the CIAMS during the past several years. This poster would be excellent for presentation at the AMS annual meeting in January as well as the Midwest Extremes Conference in October. It would also serve to illustrate why the CIAMS should be selected as “Chapter of the Year.” Please submit any photos or written documentation you may have to Tom Bellinger.

            Llyle Barker gave the treasurer’s report. The Chapter’s account balance is currently $4000, of which $2800 is earmarked for the 2nd Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather Conference in October 2005. The new dues year has started; dues payment reminder notices will be sent out soon. Annual dues are $15 for general members and $6 for students.

            Mike Spinar gave the report for the Education and Public Outreach Committee. Several student members on the committee have either graduated or pursued their careers outside Central Illinois, so new members are needed. The group will be working on many projects this year, including organizing and overseeing the student poster competition at the Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather Conference.

Invited Talk

            Dr. Patrick Francis of Bowling Green State University gave a talk entitled, “Association Between Seasonal Cycles of Teleconnections and Tornado Frequency in the United States.” During this talk, he presented a new tornado climatology based on tornado paths rather than on tornado reports, and also he examined the possible relationship between tornado frequency in the United States and teleconnective forcing mechanisms, such as El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO).

            The author began with a review of past research, discussing the climatologies of Brooks (1999) and Concannon, Brooks, and Doswell (2000). Both studies determined the frequency of occurrence of tornadoes using a similar methodology. Brooks (1999) examined all tornadoes, while the later Concannon et al. (2000) study considered the occurrence of strong F-2 or greater tornadoes on the Fujita Scale. The authors divided the country into 80 square kilometer grid boxes and examined days of tornado reports within each grid. The data were smoothed spatially and temporally.  Maxima in tormado frequency were found in Colorado, Florida, and the traditional Central Plains “tornado alley” region of the United States.

These two studies did not examine the possible relationship between tornado frequency and teleconnective forcing mechanisms.  Dr. Francis referred to the Schaefer and Marzban (2000) paper as one study that examined the relationship between tornadoes in the United States and teleconnections. This study found no statistical significance between tornado frequency and teleconnective forcings. 

Dr. Francis reviewed the methodology employed by Schaefer and Marzban (2000) and drew inspiration from his own experiences as a storm chaser, to develop a new statistical approach to the same topic. He re-examined the same data used in the aforementioned climatologies. Instead of looking at individual days of tornado reports, however, he investigated actual tornado paths using statistical techniques borrowed from the U.S. Geological Service. Employing Kernel Home Range and Least Squares Cross Validation techniques, he produced a map of tornado probability on a 1 km grid.  This grid suffered from population biases in tornado reporting.  For example, there were elevated probabilities near larger cities such as Houston, TX; Oklahoma City, OK; and Tampa Bay, FL.  Thus, these data were smoothed, resulting in a plot that compared favorably with Brooks (1999) and Concannon et al. (2000).

            Upon dividing the data into subsets based on positive, neutral, and negative ENSO and NAO anomalies, fascinating patterns began to emerge. For all tornadoes, the largest frequency of occurrence appeared during times when both ENSO and the NAO were in neutral phases. The smallest tornado probabilities took place during positive ENSO and positive NAO periods. Further examination of each of these possible phases showed that the spatial distributions of the tornado frequency also changed. There was a decrease in total frequency of occurrence when both ENSO and the NAO were negative, with peaks in Colorado, Florida, and locations just west of the Mississippi River in Arkansas and Louisiana. A teleconnection consisting of a positive ENSO and a negative NAO phase showed an increase in tornado probability, with a peak in Colorado and a broad area of high probabilities across the Gulf Coast and Southern Plains states. However, when a negative ENSO and a positive NAO were coupled, the tornado frequency peak in Colorado vanished and a strong localized peak in the lower Mississippi River Valley emerged. Finally, when both ENSO and NAO were in their positive phases, the peak region of activity was in Oklahoma and Arkansas.

            The analysis was repeated for the F2 to F5 tornado reports only. Dr. Francis noted that a possible shortcoming in this analysis stems from the low frequency of reports for these stronger, rarer, tornado events.  Nonetheless, similar patterns were present in the data for the F2 to F5 tornado reports. The negative ENSO and positive NAO pattern demonstrated a shift to the southeast in the location of the peak frequency of tornadoes, primarily over Alabama, southern Georgia, and the panhandle of Florida.  No other significant deviation from the analysis for all tornado reports was found for the rest of the continental United States.

            Finally, the analysis of the F4 and F5 tornado paths suggests that tornado alley may exhibit a “ring of fire” type of phenomenon, with a peak in distribution stretching from western Iowa southward to Oklahoma, eastward through Mississippi and Alabama, and northward into central and southern Indiana. It is not known at this time whether this is an artifact of the data bias or reporting issues, inconsistent damage analyses based on the Fujita Scale, or the result of something as substantive as elevation changes.

Notes Compiled by:

Mike Spinar, Secretary, 2004-2005 and Nancy Westcott, Secretary, 2005-2006.

References

 

Brooks, H.E., 1999: Severe thunderstorm climatological probabilities. <URL: http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/hazard/>

Concannon, P. R., H. E. Brooks, and C. A. Doswell III, 2000: Climatological risk of strong and violent tornadoes in the United States. Preprints, 2nd Symposium on Environmental Applications, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc,, 212-219.

Schaefer, J.T., and C. Marzban, 2000: Tornadoes in the United States as related to the tropical pacific sea surface temperature.  Preprints, 20th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 18-121.



Minutes of the May 24th meeting of the Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society. 

            The Central Illinois Chapter of the AMS met on May 24, 2005 at Tuscany Steak and Pasta House in Decatur, IL. Approximately 24 people attended the meeting. 

            Chris Miller, Warning Coordination Meteorologist, Lincoln WFO, and outgoing president of the CIAMS, reported:

1)                 Considerable effort was made to update the constitution and by-laws during the past year and the chapter agreed to the changes at the last meeting.

2)                 The first post-cards announcement for the planned 2nd Midwest Extreme and Hazardous Weather Conference sponsored by the Central Illinois Chapter of the AMS. The conference will be held in Champaign on 14-15 October 2005.  Featured speakers this year will be Dr. Paul Kocin, Tim Marshall, P.E., and Dr. Morris Weisman.  This conference provides a venue for the presentation of case studies, operational research, and applied climatological research related to the extreme and hazardous weather that occurs in the Midwest, including: tornadoes, severe thunderstorms, snowstorms, ice storms, floods, lake-effect snowstorms, lake-breeze storms, cold waves, heat waves, dense fog, and all related human impacts.

            Mike Spinar, research meteorologist at the Illinois Sate Water Survey and chair of the Education and Outreach Committee also shared several items of note.  First, the CIAMS provided judges for the Illinois Academy of Science’s Central Region Science Fair at Lincoln Land Community College on March 19th.  The committee also provided questions, as well as judges, for the Illinois State Olympiad Competition held April 9, 2005 and the National Science Olympiad Competitions on 19-21 May, both in Champaign, Illinois.

            New officers for the period, June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006 were selected at the meeting:

            President: Michael Kruk (mkruk@sws.uiuc.edu)

            President-Elect: Tom Bellinger (bellinger@iema.state.il.us)

            Secretary: Nancy Westcott (nan@uiuc.edu)

            Treasurer: Llyle Barker (llyle.barker@noaa.gov)

            Mr. Paul Merzlock, Lead Forecaster at the Romeoville, Illinois National Weather Service Office, presented a talk entitled, “14 Years Later: A Comparison between the Roanoke and Plainfield Tornadoes”. The talk detailed a synoptic comparison between the 28 August 1990 F-5 tornado, which struck the town of Plainfield, Illinois and the 13 July, 2004 F-4 tornado, which struck the Parsons Manufacturing Plant near Roanoke, Illinois.  Both powerful tornadoes occurred relatively late in the tornado season when usually only weaker events occur, and both events deviated from the traditional conceptual model of a strong low Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) / high vertical wind shear storm.  In contrast to the typical April or May event, these two late season storms were associated with over 6000 J/kg of surface-based CAPE and moderate to low shear values. The storms developed rapidly and both were the only significant tornado produced in Illinois during each event.

            Given that both systems evolved near a weak stationary frontal boundary, with dewpoint temperatures well into upper 70°s and lower 80°s Fahrenheit over much of the region, it is not necessarily surprising that large thunderstorms developed.  Indeed, a derecho later formed from the supercell spawning the Roanoke storm.  What is surprising, however, are the narrow ¼-mile path widths and the rapid storm initiation to tornado development (a few tens of minutes) seen with each system.

            In as much as the two storms were very similar in nature, they illustrate the differences in technology utilized by the National Weather Service between the early 1990s and the present day.  Chicago meteorologists in 1990 interpreted Weather Surveillance Radar (WSR) 57 reflectivity images without the advantage of Doppler velocity information, making it more difficult to diagnose tornadic low-level rotation.  In addition, forecasters working during the Plainfield event relied on models, such as the Nested Grid (NGM) and Limited Fine Mesh (LFM) models, which were better at showing larger scale synoptic features.  In contrast, the forecasters working in 2004 had an array of mesoscale numerical weather prediction models, including ETA, MM5, and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at their disposal to assist with forecasting storm development.  Once storm development was initiated, the WSR 88-D radar was used to diagnose the actual tornadic debris cloud.  This allowed for tailored warnings that helped save the lives of all the employees of the Parsons manufacturing plant.

After questions the meeting adjourned around 9:30 PM.

Mike Spinar, Secretary, 2004-2005 and Nancy Westcott, Secretary, 2005-2006.

 

©2003 Central Illinois Chapter of the American Meteorological Society
Last Updated: 8 December 2003  Back to HomePage